I have reviewed the classified documents that underpin both memos. I know the Nunes memo is misleading, and I know Congressman Schiff was seeking to provide a factual counterpoint. (2/3)
-
-
Show this thread
-
If the president really believes the Nunes memo vindicates him, as he has said, what is he hiding by blocking the Schiff memo? Any minor redactions should be made as quickly as possible and the memo should be released. (3/3)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Time to "Feinstein"
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Chances are Brand is leaving so she can testify to conversations she and Rod Rosenstein were party to at DOJ without a conflict of interest. Likely target is Sessions. Invest in popcorn.
-
Now that would be sweet . . . However, the Donald is nefarious. Plus, he's has a team and has had a year to plan any and all potential escape routes. Also, he has no shame and doesn't care about appearances.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's important that someone leak them. If you'd read tweets from 45's base, this is a big deal for them. They don't care if Nunes skipped footnotes & made many errors. They need to see a complete rebuttal document. It should be read by all who think they have a right to be angry.
-
Quite honestly, I don’t think they’d believe the memo either way.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Seriously? You’re comparing previous Republican Party to this one??


pic.twitter.com/8rmHvvt43r
-
The GOP changed dramatically between the 1860’s & the 1960’s. It’s been on a rapid downhill slide since then. If you’re defending today’s GOP you’re defending racism, homophobia, misogyny, xenophobia, religious intolerance, and dark money.pic.twitter.com/KWADXZ9srk
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.