Huh? They are something civilians have no need for AND they have been used in many of our (many) massacres. It’s not the end-all-be-all solution, but it is a start.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- 6 more replies
-
-
-
agree 10000% not sure why people think we're trying to tell them they can't protect themselves now. unreal
-
Imagine going to war against the current US military with hunting rifles. The second amendment was wrote in a way to allow us to be equally armed with the milita in case a tyrant government take form mass shootings like LA are terrible but guns aren't the problem. Also 1/2
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Soooo I guess that means your ok with US capital police giving them up when protecting members of Congress? Or.... nahhh? Just the citizens have to give them up and you hypocrites still get to keep them for your own protection?
-
No American should feel unsafe and unprotected. In a perfect society we would not have to worry about such things. The only people that need weapons are the military and our law enforcement personnel. Those wapons should only be used when and if necessary!
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
For those claiming that they need assault weapons, what are your reasons? General curiosity.
-
Why does government need them? If government needs them, so do you :)https://twitter.com/Joe_Hurwitz/status/928399461444935685 …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If you don't mind me asking was this before the ban being unable to obtain guns if your unable to maintain the responsibility of owning a gun due to mental illness and how long had he had the weapon?
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.