Cost more for seniors ( up to 500% more), more for pre-existing conditions (I.e. Women), less coverage... What do you have to lose? .
Under the Senate Republican bill, you would pay MORE for a health plan that covers LESS. We must defeat this bill!
-
-
-
Or should I say That's what you have to lose
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If this is true. What is the less? Is it big time charges and intricate care? Small recurrent procedures could be covered in diff plan?
-
Essentially want more of what Republicans ACTUALLY want. It's A vs. B + A (B) vs. C to get ABC... Don't think algebra thing sidelines w/ ()
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If u resist clowns would work with GOP maybe we could get a great hc bill passed! U screwed us with Obamacare!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The Senate needs to work through the break to work on this bill! Health coverage should always be a bi-partisan issue.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
do you have any comment on
@Rendon63rd's decision to block California#SinglePayer bill#SB562? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.