(2/4) The report calls for new low-yield nuclear weapons by claiming our arsenal is somehow insufficient to meet evolving threats.
(1/4) A Pentagon board suggestion that we need new “limited-use” nuclear weapons is dangerous, shortsighted & wrong.http://wapo.st/2mczAfk
-
-
-
(3/4) This is wrong. Our current nuclear arsenal is more than adequate to deter aggression against us and our allies.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It is like almost pregnant...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
tell them we'll consider it AFTER the cleanup of Hanford is done!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right cause that radiation can be controlled and we will know exactly where it will go........oh wait.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How can we EVER expect other countries to decrease or not procure nuclear weapons if we do this? WRONG MOVE!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's no leadership. The pentagon is supposed to B under civilian control but there's a madman in the WH
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's really an 'all or nothing' kind of deal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.