A "bump stock" is not protected by the 2nd Amendment. A "bump stock" isn't a firearm. So, no infringement of a Constitutional right.
The Justice Department has announced a rule banning bump stocks, but the gun lobby has already said it will sue to block the rule. We need to pass a law to ban these dangerous devices and Republicans must support my bill.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- 7 more replies
-
-
-
Bump stocks are overkill. They must be stopped.
-
I have used bumpstocks...they are a gimmick for supposed three gun competitive shooting...they do not significantly increase the rate of fire...this is a nothing ban...which does nothing to improve background checks or waiting periods which would be more beneficial
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
There are restrictions on speech and the right to assembly, both protected under the Bill of Rights. Why can there not be any restrictions on guns?
-
There are literally hundreds of laws for firearms.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
FINALLY! Something that the Trump administration trying to do that I can agree with!
-
Trump said he'd do this about a year ago. It's only because of pressure that he's following through now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
thank you
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would it be possible to sue the regulators who allowed these things to be sold openly, when their purpose is obviously to turn semi-automatic weapons into fully automatic? Modifying weapons to make them fully auto used to be illegal. People died because of this negligence.
-
Except it doesn't turn it into fully automatic. You still have to pull the trigger each time you want to fire. That still makes it a semi auto gun
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.