Perhaps your follow-up could have been...is ANYONE required to comply with a lawful subpoena?
If Brett Kavanaugh truly believes the president isn’t above the law, he should have said the president must comply with a subpoena. There’s no reason Brett Kavanaugh couldn’t have given a straight answer.pic.twitter.com/mD2I5RtET4
-
-
-
Or simply remind him that SCOTUS in the case United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) directly held a president can be required to comply with a subpoena. Either he knows the law or he doesn't!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ask him how he paid off his massive debt so suddenly
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You all should’ve walked out. It’s disappointing to see all you still not doing the right thing.
-
Shannon, the problem with walking out is that there is no chance of having an honest fight. Yes, the Dem Senators are being railroaded, but they need to stay there. They would be forsaking their duties if they leave.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Heck - he can't give a handshake to a grieving father and you expect a straight answer???
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why didn't you say that in the moment? Isn't that the time?
-
Good question!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There was no potential hypothetical in her question...it was a straight out question of law. Clearly, he was over reading the question with the current state of affairs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.