You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Late last night the Judiciary Committee was informed in a letter from Bill Burck that Presidents Bush and Trump would claim executive privilege on more than 100,000 pages of Brett Kavanaugh’s records from the White House Counsel’s Office. (1/5)
In contrast, not one page of Elena Kagan’s White House records were withheld due to executive privilege claims. This is just the latest action in a series of actions to obstruct our review of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination. (2/5)
President Trump and Senate Republicans have gone to extraordinary lengths to hide Brett Kavanaugh’s record from the Senate and American people. (3/5)
The only explanation for their actions is that these records would further reveal Kavanaugh's controversial history and ideological views. (4/5)
Senators should not be willing to cast a “yes” vote for a nomination of this magnitude when more than 90 percent of the nominee’s record is being denied to them. (5/5)
I think the circumstances of Kennedy’s retirement are disqualifying for Kavanaugh as well. An illigetimate President orchestrated this vacancy and Democrats should withhold quoram.
THE COURTS SHOULD HAVE A BALANCE OF LEFT AND RIGHT SO THAT ALL OF AMERICA IS REPRESENTED & THE CONSTITUTION IS THE BALANCE NOT THE PARTY THAT IS THE AMERICAN WAY
THIS WOULD KEEP OUR SUPREME COURT FAIR & BALANCED
Pls forgive my ignorance, but aren’t those records subject to FOIA?
GOP is looking for excuses not to allow these docs to be made public.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
