I'm a Dem but this is not true. There are many who still have clearance but have not been once for years. Security clearance should only be granted or retained if a valid reason and should be reviewed frequently. That's how security access is granted in business every day.
There’s a good reason that former national security officials are granted continued access to sensitive information: They offer invaluable service by collaborating with current national security leaders. Revoking John Brennan’s clearance harms our national security.pic.twitter.com/tHLC2Hb04j
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Abuse of power is an impeachable offense.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Wrong, it is a security risk if there is no need for access. Why didn't you call out Obama?
#TrumpDerangementSyndrome https://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/government-security-clearance-list-100195 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Brennan went on TV and accused Pres. Trump of treason so, he losses his security clearance, did he know something by using his security clearance, then exsposed it, or did he lie.
-
He is a liar and has comitted Treason.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
False. Hiring him in the 1st place was wrong...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So does having a Chinese spy as your driver but I guess that’s OK with you!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.