How can a Supreme Court Justice make a commitment prior to having heard both sides of the argument. Does that not show prejudice?
Roe v. Wade is law of the land. To insist that a Supreme Court nominee pledge to overturn that precedent is undemocratic, disrespectful of our institutions and an insult to Americans. #WhatsAtStake
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
No more demur denunciations please - don't bring a knife to a gun fight. Y'all need to be scrappy and mean and rip these GOP Senators apart. No new SCOTUS until after the election.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Killing innocent babies, the majority of those being minorities is an insult to Americas moral fiber. May the blood shed finally end.
#walkaway. -
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
Nobody is insisting that a Supreme Court nominee pledge to overturn anything. That being said, overturning Roe v Wade would just throw the issue back to the states. I'm sure it would continue to be perfectly legal to kill preborn children in CA.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.