Trying to co erce people into unwanted Union membership. Hell no! We don't want to be fleeced by Democrats who oppose our president, our constitution and our country
-
-
-
The ruling wasn't about union membership. It was about the administrative fees the union charges to offset the costs of contract negotiations and representing folks in employment disputes, both things the union is required by law to do, even for non-members.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@SenFeinstein lost a lot of money when the Supreme Court made its rulings about unions. Now she’s trying to reinstate the rule by creating laws that like Obamacare forced individuals to participate even if their political views are differentThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No one said the union couldn’t bargain it just says you can’t force people to pay for it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No Feinstein, it gives them the right not be owned by the unions!!!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thank God for the ruling!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.