Well, don't forget to remind everyone that someone under 2 criminal investigations should not be allowed to choose his own judge. If you still believe in democracy & the Constitution, that is.
-
-
-
Yes! And this is EXACTLY the kind of argument that Dems soft pedal again and again when in actuality it is of the greatest import and WHY we are in this seismic democratic dilemma right now. Let's not forget to politely remind everyone with civility! BE FIERCE is more like it!!!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No, the issue is that no president under criminal investigation should get to appoint a SCOTUS justice that will rule on that very investigation.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don’t forget to mention he’s under investigation for treason and should not be picking judges. SCREAM THE HOUSE IS ON FIRE!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
GO Diane! We need you to stand up for us!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We've got your back, Senator Feinstein!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hope you will also advocate for
@CoryBooker 's legal argument that a President under investigation should not hand-pick a judge who might be hearing his case in the future.#SaveSCOTUS#CoryBookerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mitch said we needed to wait & hear from the people before voting on a SCOTUS Justice. Is he saying he doesn’t need to listen anymore?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.