great we won't accept the Syrian refugees, but we will bomb their county because that will be better for them?
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
No one is suggesting that the US bring in "the entire country". The question is whether to have a 100% ban on Syrian refugees.
-
Seems strange to be so worked up about Syrian deaths that we're willing to wage war, and yet not be willing to take any of them in.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As a constituent, I wish you would hold the president accountable for not seeking congressional approval as the law requires.
-
technically the war powers act allows trump to do this without approval for 90 days
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Sir, you are my Senator. I'm disappointed in you. I assume you know it was a Constitutional violation without Congressional approval.
-
Inaccurate. Refer to the War Powers Act.
-
War Powers Act applies in situations of self defense.
-
My point is that President is allowed tactical strikes, etc...without Congressional approval.
-
One hell of a tactical strike. Syria used the same AF base to launch another attack TODAY. Spent almost 100 million $ on 59 missles.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As a constituent, I'm disappointed in your statement Senator. Action should be taken against Assad, but NOT by executive fiat.
-
Inaccurate. Refer to WAR Powers Act. President can act & then has 90 days to obtain Congressional approval.
-
Just because something CAN be done doesn't mean that it SHOULD be done. I agree on action but we should not act unilaterally.
-
We just disagree. 65% support this very limited, tactical strike. Msg needed sending &
@POTUS got it done. -
@POTUS just rang Assad's bell without significant loss of life...and China/Russia/Iraq/NKorea just heard it, loud & clear.#SyriaStrikes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.