There is no need to consider further the frivolous second article of impeachment that would remove the president for asserting his constitutional prerogative to protect confidential conversations with his close advisers. 4/15
-
-
Our founding documents provide for duly elected presidents who serve with “the consent of the governed,” not at the pleasure of the United States Congress. Let the people decide. 15/15
Prikaži ovu nit -
Read my full statement on my vote regarding additional evidence in the impeachment proceedings here: https://www.alexander.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=PressReleases&id=AA7E4960-6788-43A9-AF03-5DC456A0D448 …
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Wrong! The actions of a president would cause impeachment. The evidence would either clear or convict.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
All your hard work and this is your legacy sir! On your way out you left our constitution in tatters all because of buddy McConnell telling him he could not do the right thing. The trump base is now controlling entire Republican Party or what is left of the party of Abe.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
In voting against witnesses, you have voted to create a perpetual monarch. You have voted against the principles of our Constitution.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
We have already gotten to this point .. if Hillary would have won, she would have been impeached .. if a D wins in 2020 and the R’s control the House in 20 or 22 it will happen again .. we saw the new norm the past few weeks.
-
Pretty sure you don’t get impeached if you don’t break the law... they can’t do it just because they don’t like the president/his policies.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Bullshit. If that was the case, the House could have filed several articles - emoluments clause; campaign finance violations (for which his lawyer is doing time), to name two - but they picked sure cases of abuse of power & obstruction & GOP still picked party over country!
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.