*w/ whatever
-
-
-
For the record: among Senate leans NY control is tied (they are in coalition) & other three are all GOP controlled. So goal is to hold. Among House: CT currently in Dem hands (looking for a flip), ME is coalition (where Dems may take control outright), NH/MI are looking to hold.
Show this thread -
Likewise for purple Senate toss ups: WI/ME/CO are all GOP looking to hold. CT only potential flip. AK is only House toss up, looking to break coalition & go full GOP control (already have majority, cucks need to be forced out or margin expanded where they can’t force coalition).
Show this thread -
This is a hard map for GOP (much like Dems nationally in Senate this season, GOP has a lot of gains they’re forced to defend). Dems want to route GOP in northeast + CO. GOP only real hope for pick up is CT (both chambers) + break AK coalition, hold anywhere else (FL/MI etc).
Show this thread -
Dems know NH + ME were too close in 2016. Looking to punish GOP & take back both legislative bodies in both states. Also force GOP out of NY + CO Senates (thus giving Dems total leg control in both states). Surprised CT is competitive but it is & that’s a chance for GOP to gain.
Show this thread -
GOP looking reasonably ok for holding FL/AZ Senates + MI House. MI was closer than ME/NH in 2016, but I’m suspecting the voters in rust belt aren’t as shitlibby as in New England. Just a guess. More blue collar people.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That chart is wrong, there are no Senate elections in Oklahoma this year.
-
State level senate. These are all state level races.
-
Gotcha.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.