Like, it’s meta. Even if it’s a lie it still works: cause it’s still holding up a mirror to people for being credulous or cynical enough to pretend they’re willing to believe things w/ zero evidence. You’ve believed Ford. Why not the 4chan larper? Same difference amirite?
-
-
Show this thread
-
We actually have more evidence for the 4chan larper: Avenatti locked his account, the story is detailed, the larper doesn’t put forward four witnesses who then say it never happened. The larper is above Ford on the believability scale rn. More evidence supporting it. So it’s true
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This my current political theoryhttps://twitter.com/mediacritizer/status/1044665551606341632 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds pretty C R E D I B L E to me
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.