I don’t know if it’s merely sloppy thinking or more sinister, but the left sure is slippery w/ language Same people who jump immediately to “NOT ALL MUSLIMS” when talking terror correlation (even tho no one says “all”) are more than willing to say “rapist Kavanaugh” w/o evidence
-
Show this thread
-
Maybe I’m just a stickler for honesty, but I try to be careful in putting in the necessary caveats when I’m unsure. “Not all”, “in the main”, “on balance” when I don’t want to get a “akchually” lecture. These ppl? No problem. They call him a rapist w/ no trial, no evidence nada.
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likesShow this thread -
They meme it into their reality (and possibly other people’s) by repetition. Again: don’t know which are just really sloppy thinkers (NPCs) & which are playing funny little games, but they’re trafficking in levels of dishonesty I would never be able to live with if I did this.
6 replies 0 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @JamesHardon8
Even as someone on the far right, who recognizes the futility of engaging w/ these ppl & the potential necessity of sinking to their level to win (to alinsky them like they do us), it’s still a hard pill to swallow. Cause I’m not an amoral scoundrel. But they do this effortlessly
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
For me to behave like them: things would have to be pretty bad. I’d have to really feel up against the wall. It would be a profound inner struggle to say “that’s it Selim: if we have to lie, cheat & steal, we will to win” It would destroy my current psyche. For them: it’s nothing
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.