What we ought to do, as the party aligned w/ the material sectors (big agriculture, the nefarious oil companies of left wing fever dreams): refuse to associate w/ left wingers. “We don’t have to provide you food & gasoline. We’re a private company. Grow/refine your own stuff.”
-
Show this thread
-
Or truckers bringing goods into cities: “as conservative Trump voters, we don’t feel comfortable economically engaging w/ you city folk. You can find your own way to get necessities in or you can eat concrete & glass. We’re a private company after all.”
1 reply 3 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @SelimSeesYou
Y'all are fucked then. There is a world of difference in economic viability in banning come right-winger on twitter and not delivering food.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BladesOfChaos70
Right now I agree. The broader these bans get (in terms of both numbers of ppl & scope), the more the calculus changes. They’re moving into banking & credit. There might be no other choice in the future but to use that leverage to make this stop.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SelimSeesYou
But how do you plan on making food companies go along with it. Are they really gonna let people not deliver food and make them money cause some guy on the internet got fucked with. If the truckers themselves refuse they'll be fired and replaced. Self driving is coming soon to.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I’m talking when this gets into denying credit cards & bank accounts. Which has started.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.