Just a reminder going back to threads I did a long time ago: WI is Trump’s weakest Rust Belt state. Final round of polling showed Clinton 6.5 points ahead. Results showed it was a state “Clinton lost” (turnout way down in key counties) more than “Trump won”.
-
-
No. He surged in the last week.
-
Thus, it wasn't the I'll stay home effect. It was him surging toward the end because people wanted a change.
-
That’s not what I saw in the county data. I didn’t see him do particularly better than any other republican in Wisconsin. She collapsed in urban counties.
-
She did, but if you look at state polling in the last week in Pa, Mi, and Wi, he was surging the last week of the campaign.
-
Checked RCP: yea I see it. MI was crazy at the end there. Took off like a rocket. WI it was less marked a climb & she was surging simultaneously in WI.
-
He was also really close in Minnesota. All in all I stand by what I said. Had he put more money in, had a serious organization, and focused on POPULIST economics (no small gubmnet tax cut nonsense) and immigration he would have won far more. Probably around 55% nationally.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Miniscule.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.