1/ It’s just so typical of Democrats to misallocate scarce resources & accomplish nothing for it. As they did in Ohio last night. I realize maybe the polling told them they had a shot but to gamble that much money on a deep red district just to score a morale boost (seat will...
-
Show this thread
-
2/ be up again in November) is bone headed. R’s didn’t even show in numbers & they still didn’t win. Now I get it: should never have been close, R’s sunk money to defend it. But R’s have money. And home team advantage in the sense it is a red district, not purple. This isn’t to..
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
3/ to say “give up Dems, never fight for anything.” You gotta try to win in politics. But a 3 month stint, to fight this uphill battle when already cash strapped is laughable. Would be like Trump sinking all money into CA & saying “I almost cracked CA! Wow! What a win that was!”
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
4/ Lesson being pick your battles. Trump won on the cheap in 2016. Dems are trying to win by throwing around money they don’t even have on races that doesn’t have remotely favorable odds (as close as they got, they still have nothing to show for it now). /end
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
-
Replying to @SelimSeesYou
I keep hearing the Rep’s money game is about to drop in the suburban districts after Labor Day, when people are paying attention. Not saying it will work, just FYI. With Trump though, it just might.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
Trump did it in 2016. Spending blitz came late. Before that it was just his rallies/twitter.
-
-
Replying to @SelimSeesYou
Well, he would know how to do it.
@GOPChairwoman is on his side, so hopefully@NRCC is onboard.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.