Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @SebastianGluth
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @SebastianGluth
-
Prikvačeni tweet
Decisions between >2 options are tricky. In our newest work, we could not replicate a previous “divisive normalization” or “distractor effect” in decisions btw 3 food snacks. But we found remarkable dynamic interactions between valuation & attention: https://rdcu.be/b09u0 (1/6)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sebastian Gluth proslijedio/la je Tweet
When deciding between high/low value options, we can be influenced by irrelevant choices. Contrary to prior results,
@SebastianGluth et al find value-based attention plays a role in "irrational" choices, but no evidence for a role of divisive normalisationhttps://buff.ly/2OGoCOHHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sebastian Gluth proslijedio/la je Tweet
Nice paper! We find either no or *opposite* effect of best-worst option predicted by DN in a social choice set when you model random effect of participant. If you leave that out, we get same results as Louie et al. Thought you might find it interesting: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54238bf2e4b068090a9b54bb/t/5d67e21bf2d5bd0001ee3490/1567089180925/Chang+et+al.%2C+2019+-+JESP.pdf …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sebastian Gluth proslijedio/la je Tweet
The Confidence Database is now out in
@NatureHumBehav! It has 145 datasets with data from over 8,700 participants and almost 4 million trials. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-019-0813-1 …#openscience THREADpic.twitter.com/XFad3DUwo2
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
You should also check out the News & Views by
@summerfieldlab on our work (https://rdcu.be/b09tS ) and a blog post on the Behavioral & Social Sciences blog of@nature (https://go.nature.com/2SgbZLc ) that I wrote (which explains our study and reasons to run it in simple words). (6/6).Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I want to add that we asked the first author of the original study,
@kenwaylouie, for quite some information, and he was always cooperative and helpful (sending us original materials etc.). Kenway might have a different view on our work, but his cooperation was exemplary. (5/6)Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The eye-tracking results support our idea that better worst options receive more attention. But this does not make decisions less accurate, just slower. We explain these results by extending the aDDM (
@KrajbichLab), such that attention and valuation kind of "escalate". (4/6)Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This was surprising to us, given that our goal was to replicate the effect, and then to offer an alternative explanation: Better worst option make decisions harder, because they capture attention and can't be ignored. This is why we used eye tracking in 1 of our experiments (3/6)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The original study reported that better worst options make it harder to choose among the 2 good ones, as predicted by divisive normalization of neural value coding. But we don't find this effect in our 2 experiments, both preregistered
@OSFramework: https://osf.io/qrv2e/ (2/6)Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sebastian Gluth proslijedio/la je Tweet
great new paper out by
@SebastianGluth suggests biases in multi-alternative decisions may be due to attention, not normalisation: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-0822-0 …. See also our comment with@atomsrivethttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-0824-y …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sebastian Gluth proslijedio/la je Tweet
Thrilled to be speaking at the Symposium on the Cognitive Underpinnings of Economic Behavior in Amsterdam on June 10, with a number of other wonderful speakers, including
@affectivebrain@the_njs. https://attention-economics.eu/symposium/#neuroeconomicsHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sebastian Gluth proslijedio/la je Tweet
Happy to see our paper being published in CBB. We show that different speed-accuracy trade-off operationalizations map onto different components of the
#DDM. Thank you Leendert and Guy for your support and guidance throughout this processhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42113-020-00074-y …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
We link memory-based decisions to decisions under uncertainty by showing that people prefer better remembered options in gains (a phenomenon we call the "memory bias") but exhibit the opposite pattern in losses - just as people avoid uncertainty in gains but seek them in losses.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
New preprint out from our group (with Regina Weilbaecher and
@PMKraemer) showing that one reason why memories bias value-based decisions is the uncertainty that (poor) memory entails. https://psyarxiv.com/jsqp4/ . Predictions preregistered (#openscience). One more sentence...Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sebastian Gluth proslijedio/la je Tweet
PhD and PostDoc position at the BuechelLab in Hamburg (
@SysNeuroHamburg) on neurobiological mechanisms underlying cognitive modulation of pain. See https://sites.google.com/view/buechellab/join-the-lab … for details.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sebastian Gluth proslijedio/la je Tweet
I‘m currently experiencing my first Christmas time as an editor and will never again submit anything before the holidays. That‘s crazy!pic.twitter.com/IgvEQyFDRw
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sebastian Gluth proslijedio/la je Tweet
This is an incredibly disingenuous, morally bankrupt letter, and as a psychologist, I'm deeply disappointing that
@PsychScience and@APA have both endorsed it (the latter doesn't surprise me much; the former does, and makes me very sad).https://twitter.com/AmericanPublish/status/1207345037266292737 …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sebastian Gluth proslijedio/la je Tweet
Big thank you to guest editor
@KinglaKing, who despite being tired of hearing about ego depletion (like many of you!), was helpful, funny, and constructive. Thank you! /endpic.twitter.com/trCjUFb3ycPrikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Today, Jerome Busemeyer received the honorary doctorate from the Faculty of Psychology of
@UniBasel, and@SpektorMikhail the award for the best publication in 2019 (for our Psych Rev paper: https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2018-67240-002.html …). I'm just proud to collaborate with these excellent scientists!pic.twitter.com/qap7H1sY85
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Sebastian Gluth proslijedio/la je Tweet
Susan Fiske continues to abuse her power to publish fake science in PNAS. Who wants to collaborate on a response (looking for 100+ authors).https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/11/21/1910951116.short?rss=1 …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.