Sean T at RCPVerified account

@SeanTrende

Sr. Elections Analyst at RCP. Co-Author, Almanac Am. Pols. 2014. Recovering Attorney. If you think this has a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.

Joined March 2010

Tweets

You blocked @SeanTrende

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @SeanTrende

  1. Pinned Tweet
    4 Jun 2017

    *opens twitter* *reads first few tweets* *shakes head* *closes twitter*

    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    18 hours ago

    omg, he was into HAARP. This is one of my favorite conspiracy theories. It's got everything. Secret government programs, weather control, secret wars with the Russians and Nikola Tesla.

    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    15 hours ago

    Wear a black dress shirt and a red tie and people will know you’re dressed as either a libertarian or an Olive Garden host

    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    20 hours ago

    Nearly all data from Day 6 of 14 in. Not much has changed, folks. It's essentially tied. No waves. The Democrats are going to need every bit of that Clark ballot firewall to offset the GOP's rural performance. Microcosm of country: Urban vs. rural.

    Undo
  5. This last point is very, very, very true. I've met many people who are very obviously capable of appreciating the wrongness of their actions, but who nevertheless scare the pants off of me.

    Undo
  6. Curious—why is turkey putting the screws to Saudi Arabia? I’m assuming there is a geopolitical backstory here?

    Undo
  7. Likewise, it's questionable whether the Democrats would have flipped their stance on Civil Rights but for the growing influence of African-Americans in key northern cities in the 30s and 40s. Again, I think the critique in the OP is reasonable, just incomplete. 3/3

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. was that it actually amplified the concerns of non-white groups. To wit, the concerns of Cuban-Americans would not receive nearly as much attention if they were uniformly distributed, as opposed to concentrated in Florida. 2/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. The gathering conventional wisdom that the Electoral College is (presently) biased against nonwhites because they are concentrated in a few states is a reasonable argument. At the same time, not so long ago one of the defense of the EC 1/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. Undo
  11. Retweeted
    23 hours ago

    D internal so big grain of salt BUT Reed, quite surprisingly, came pretty close to losing in 2012. Have had him listed at Likely (not Safe) R for a long time this cycle because of it

    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    23 hours ago
    Undo
  13. Things with a 10% chance of happening happen 10% of the time.

    Undo
  14. That's the R path to victory in NJ. Wouldn't bet on it.

    Undo
  15. Democratic groups haven't dumped $6M on this race because they think it is in the bag. I don't thiink it's a tossup, except under the definition of TU that includes TX and TN (which Cook does). But there's a path to R victory I didn't see a month ago.

    Undo
  16. Retweeted
    Oct 25

    That’s.....that’s not how lawyering works

    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    Oct 26
    Undo
  18. Oct 26

    With that said, never forget that this is the NJ-GOP and Senate races since 1976.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. Oct 26

    Wow. Cook moves NJ-Sen to TU.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    Oct 25

    I could watch this all day.

    Undo
  21. Oct 25
    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·