We need to be careful that "consent" doesn't become misused, nor that it become elevated to some kind of idol. Civil disobedience means going against certain people's consent. Protests and marches don't have popular consent. Homeless people don't need consent to exist and camp.
-
Show this thread
-
I just...we're on a precipice where "Be gay, do crimes" is being countered by this new and weird misuse of consent that's, like, "don't wear clothes people don't like, don't throw bricks, don't trespass, don't break indecency laws, and don't work binding magic against abusers".
3 replies 284 retweets 2,056 likesShow this thread -
It would genuinely not surprise me if we start seeing "consent" laws that require trans people to get parental and spousal "consent" before we transition, and that require pregnant people to get "consent" before aborting. We need to be prepared for that next step.
5 replies 226 retweets 1,899 likesShow this thread -
And that isn't going to happen if we treat all demands for "consent" as valid and all accusations of non-consent as equally dire. There is a difference between non-consensually groping someone vs, idk, borrowing their car without consent. There just is.
4 replies 91 retweets 1,484 likesShow this thread -
And I'm...as a rape survivor, I'm pretty damn annoyed to see women being called out for "consent violations" when my read of the situation is that of an abuse victim trying to protect herself and praying that her abuser has a change of heart and stops hurting her. But that's me.
2 replies 77 retweets 1,420 likesShow this thread -
Ana Mardoll Retweeted Rook Stone
Yes! And I actually *have* seen people argue that you can't "non-consensually" prevent someone from driving home drunk because of bodily autonomy. That is an actual real argument I've witnessed.https://twitter.com/Rook_Stone/status/1403936163669299202 …
Ana Mardoll added,
3 replies 100 retweets 1,340 likesShow this thread -
Ana Mardoll Retweeted Bi Dyke Energy
I have for reals seen people say this, yeah.
https://twitter.com/Azure_Husky/status/1403937490264809473?s=19 …Ana Mardoll added,
1 reply 33 retweets 983 likesShow this thread -
Anyway, I'm going to bed and I pray this thread doesn't blow up. Goodnight, friends.
6 replies 5 retweets 783 likesShow this thread -
Yes, when you take someone's car keys away, you are cutting off their freedom of movement. It IS a violation of freedom. That's my point: sometimes we have to violate someone's freedom if the alternative is worse. Driving drunk gets other people killed.pic.twitter.com/Tox8PjDTi4
2 replies 82 retweets 863 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @AnaMardoll
…is it also a "bodily autonomy issue" for a cop (I mean, fuck cops anyway, but in the ideal, hypothetical case) to pull someone over for driving recklessly, and for the state to revoke their driver's license because they got too many DUIs?
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes
what about for a bar bouncer to remove a patron who's drunk and harassing or threatening the other customers, and for the bar to ban that person from ever returning? isn't that "taking away their freedom of movement"?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.




