"safe" in the sense that participants and attendees need not fear being harmed, yes, of course, and the presence of kink communities doesn't conflict with that. "safe and uncontroversial"? I don't really think so!
Show this thread
I was going to stop tweeting about this ridiculous 
but I saw someone say pride should be "safe and uncontroversial"
-
-
-
There are two ways pride could be "uncontroversial", the way I see it. It could sand itself down into a corporate-friendly, theme-park-ified, anodyne and toothless celebration of a vague idea of acceptance within conformity—in which case it would be dead already.
Show this thread -
Or, society could advance such that pride's core priority of radical acceptance and anti-hierarchical, anti-capitalist, anti-fascist pluralism, and in particular of freedom from oppression for all queers, becomes uncontroversial. And then pride as we know it would be unnecessary.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.