Cis, he/him, not interesting. Leftlib/Demsoc cusp, Socdem rising, moon in Ancom. Header: my buddy Alexander, best cat in the world, 3/02–10/16. 
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
"the law doesn't strictly require doing a thing, therefore no one can criticize me for not doing that thing" is not actually an argument
don't get me wrong, I'm pro-density, I love neighborhoods that look like this, I just think people shouldn't be dismissive of accessibility needs on the grounds that "the ADA doesn't require it". Surely these designs can be revised to be more accessible.
in one of the threads, someone suggested interspersing buildings of all accessible units, and separately, having 4-over-1 type buildings with first-floor commercial on the block corners, and those both seem like reasonable ideas to me.
(another suggesting: roof decks on those rowhouses, which, yes, absolutely. but maybe also solar panels!)
the original tweet had a followup showing narrow, fenced backyards behind each unit, and I like that, but I also think you'd want (lockable from both sides) gates in the fences, so you can interact with your neighbors across the back fence without going around the whole block.
also every few blocks, maybe every half dozen or so, there should be a small square block that's just a little park.
If you were doing new duplexes now I think you could do ground-floor entrances for an accessible lower-level unit, and then also an upstairs unit, instead of the side-by-sides we have here. (Theoretically what I grew up with in Belmont except SUPER HILL so everyone had steps)
(Also I'm amused those are described as "very affordable" because that's exactly the architecture of Park Slope and the Back Bay, and, well.)
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
