Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ScottClif
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ScottClif
-
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
Material interests or culture/values? We show that both matter, but for different groups of voters. Parties can exploit this by making policy promises that resonate with the values of core voters but are targeted at materially directly affected voters. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ajps.12503 …pic.twitter.com/h78gerzM4I
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
Did you ever think to yourself, "man, it is crazy that psychology has made it this far as a science without ever demonstrating evidence that participants *understand* items?" Check out our
@improvingpsych workshop: Improving Psychological Measurement: Introducing the RPE Methodpic.twitter.com/BmdWbmPbRT
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
New
@ScottClif et al in Public Opinion Quarterly: An Improved Question Format for Measuring Conspiracy Beliefs https://academic.oup.com/poq/advance-article/doi/10.1093/poq/nfz049/5717683 … "evidence suggests that researchers adopt the explicit choice format for measuring conspiracy beliefs and provide a no-opinion response option"pic.twitter.com/AqkOfU4eth
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
So, our findings suggest that past work has overstated the prevalence of conspiracy belief and given us a biased picture of who actually holds these beliefs. Surely not the last word, but hopefully a step forward! 6/6
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
It also seems to matter for correlates of belief. Apparent effects of political knowledge and cognitive reflection largely disappear, likely bc these variables also predict DK responses, which our format reduces. 5/6pic.twitter.com/cao68UWEns
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Relative to our preferred format, an agree-disagree scale w/no midpoint nearly doubles conspiracy endorsement! For example, Iraq War conspiracy endorsement goes from 28% to 56%! This seems bad. 4/6pic.twitter.com/umEeStJE8n
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
We think this matters bc many people know little about the events we ask about! So we propose a different format that asks Ss to pick between 2 explanations for an event: conspiratorial vs. conventional. Our format (with DK) yielded lowest endorsement rates & DK rates. 3/6
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
We systematically reviewed measurement of conspiracy beliefs. It’s a mess. Sometimes a don’t know is offered, sometimes a midpoint, sometimes neither. How these options are coded varies a lot too. And DK is often the modal response! 2/6pic.twitter.com/J1nApKGwCU
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Interested in measuring conspiracy beliefs? New paper out at POQ with
@UHPoliticalSci grad students@Yongkwangk and Brian Sullivan. We argue common measures inflate conspiracy belief and we propose a better measure. https://academic.oup.com/poq/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/poq/nfz049/5717683?redirectedFrom=fulltext … Preprint: http://scottaclifford.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/CKS_Conspiracies-preprint.pdf … 1/6Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
In-print today: My article with
@AndyDelton and Peter DeScioli on moral obstinacy in political negotiations.https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12612 …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
Are you a survey researcher, concerned with minority views and behaviors, e.g., "fake news", violence, suicide or sexual orientation? Read this paper, weep about quality of self-reports and apply the proposed & elegant diagnostic tools: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3102/0013189X14534297 … (1/3)
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
Access influential articles from
#APSR with our compliments: http://ow.ly/kHMh50xPXhl - featuring articles by@beth_simas,@ScottClif,@jhkirkland1,@joshmccrain,@ConnorDHuff,@rahsaanmax and morepic.twitter.com/hQ2MmDi0L2
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
New working paper (w Mario Luca,
@j_a_tucker & J Nagler) which provides a new angle on online clickbait news. Key question: how do ppl choose which media to consume? Want congenial information or trust congenial soucres more?https://osf.io/xfq6c/Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
Television news systematically gives more speaking time to extreme members of Congress, due to gatekeeping biases. My new article w/ Jeremy Padgett &
@jldhouston, out today in Journal of Communication (@icahdq@poli_com). Happy holidays! https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz039 …pic.twitter.com/HixAqU620r
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
(1/n) As researchers, we like measurement tools with a lot of variance & distributions that are compatible with OLS . In a polarized environment, survey answers collected using Likert items are not researchers' cup of tea
[question: favor/oppose a border wall?]pic.twitter.com/71eSvZY81f
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
Politically motivated reasoning might just be the effect of prior beliefs and not motivated reasoning per se https://psyarxiv.com/yuzfj/
#SocSciResearch by@Ben_Tappin,@GordPennycook, &@DG_Randpic.twitter.com/jEiNBFRlvn
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
New review article! In ‘When and Why Is Economic Inequality Seen as Fair’ I argue that people evaluate inequality by referring to broadly shared rules of fairness. Disagreements primarily have to do with whether these rules have been followed. http://www.kstrump.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Trump-When-Is-Inequality-Fair-2019.12.pdf …pic.twitter.com/fN3HLIBUe3
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je Tweet
Political observers often use the word "authenticity" to describe political candidates and leaders. However, electoral research lagged behind. In our new paper
@PolBehavior, we define and operationalize the concept, and test its impact on voting behavior.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-019-09589-y …Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Scott Clifford proslijedio/la je TweetHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Help from psych folks? I've seen claims that between-subjects designs are less likely to replicate, but haven't seen an actual analysis. Any leads?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.