Did you read his blog post?
-
-
I did after I posted. His post is disingenuous by using false choice to sort his claim that there are only two interpretations of Trumps words, and he gets to define them. Interesting that the 'crazy' one is the one he disputed, how convenient.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @kfrench581 @jamlee10
"Disingenuous" is the mind-reader tell for cognitive dissonance. I accept your surrender.
2 replies 2 retweets 41 likes -
Lol,
@ScottAdamsSays. Accusing someone of trying to play mind-reader by talking about “tells.” How fascinating that you can read OP’s mind about his mind-reading. You are truly special.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @m3anderthal @ScottAdamsSays and
OP said Scott was disingenuous. The OP posted what is on his mind. Scott did not have to read OP’s mind. Scott read the OP’s tweet.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @SurvivorRules @ScottAdamsSays and
Selective use of quotes, which Scott did in his article (leaving off “on both sides” to make his point) is certainly evidence of being disingenuous, at least to the same level as Scott’s accusation. Either you accept “tells” as arguments, or you don’t. Just, be consistent.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @m3anderthal @ScottAdamsSays and
Where would put “on both sides” in the article? It wouldn’t make a difference. Scott quoted “fine people” in the article to describe Trump’s full statement.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SurvivorRules @ScottAdamsSays and
His full statement was: “You also had some very fine people on both sides,” and he deflected from accusations of alt-right violence by inventing the word “alt-left” to describe folks protesting open racists. Leaving those points out, as Scott did, is a “tell” for disingenuous.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @m3anderthal @SurvivorRules and
Antifa didn't invent itself just to fight the tiki torch guys. Your context is broken. And "both sides" means both sides of the statue debate.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @SurvivorRules and
So now you’re reading Trump’s mind about what he meant to say? He didn’t say “in the debate,” so your continued defense of this baseless point is pretty clearly disingenuous.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
No mind-reading needed for reading comprehension. My interpretation is normal and consistent with everything he has said before and after. Your interpretation is that he threw his own family under the bus in public, came out as a public racist, and Israel didn't notice.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.