I'm just saying hezbollah is still classified as a foreign terrorist organization by the state dept, so Iranian support for them, even politically is still state sponsored terrorism
-
-
Replying to @iron_foundation @ScottAdamsSays
Ok but read again the question. Your point is Off Topic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @ScottAdamsSays
I don't see how it's off topic. He asked for examples post Iran deal, every link I provided (save the '09 one) were instances within the last year. While it's not isis level terrorism, the two geopus are still classified as terrorist organizations, thus state sponsored terrorism
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iron_foundation @ScottAdamsSays
You forgot to adress the arguments showing your points were all off. Q: show “Iranian support for terrorism.” since treaty A: ... but Iran supports Hezbollah =>Hz hasn't commited terror 4 decades. Invalid. A: ... but Hamas. => Not really since 2009. Invalid.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @ScottAdamsSays
Okay again. 2017 Hamas leaders admits in interview Iran is their funding them at high levels again (defense news article in my last reply). And as for Hezbollah acts of terror, yes, they've been dormant, but they are still classified as a terrorist organization by the U.S. Govt
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iron_foundation @ScottAdamsSays
1) This classification is in the premises of the question, which point is to actually questions that classification. So it's not a point. 2) Iran came back to support in 2017. I can't find any terror attack during Iran's backing. Can you?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @ScottAdamsSays
Okay first of all Iran isn't going to come out and say "yeah we definitely facilitated that latest rocket attack," funding is funding. As for the classification issue, that is something that should be looked at, but as of right now they're still an FTO. Which was my point
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iron_foundation @ScottAdamsSays
Don't think I want to avoid debate bc I'd have horses in the race - I don't. It's just that twitter forces us to stick to the point, and you're not. Read again the question. He's asking for exemples. You don't have any, I don't, maybe someone has but 'til then, we're not helping.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GregoryMakles @ScottAdamsSays
I provided examples post deal. The question wasn't whether they sponsored acts of terror it was whether Iran sponsored terrorism. Both Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organizations and have been publicly reported to still be Iranian backed. That is state sponsored terrorism
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iron_foundation @ScottAdamsSays
Both Hamas and Hezbollah are terrorist organizations => according to some but not all. Hence the request to see what act of terror has been sponsored post treaty. You're taking the word of ppl who promised you WDM in Iraq to justify an oil war. That's not responsible citizenship.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Remind me never to debate you. Thanks for the assist. Your thinking is flawless.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @iron_foundation
Getting this from you who I am learning from on that regard and others feels like an extraordinary accomplishment. This morning's coffee tastes awesome. Thank you!
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.