My standard is what I said in my original Tweet, Scott. Alex Jones is uniquely influential, uniquely bad, & uniquely damaging to the causes that I care about — he should not be legitimized. But, if you decide to go on his show & get the chance to call him out, you must take it.
-
-
Replying to @JerryDunleavy
Uniquely? CNN reported (and still does) that the President of the United States publicly sided with racists. That is untrue. And seriously dangerous for the country. Do they get a pass from you because it does not qualify as "uniquely" dangerous?https://bit.ly/2EpNBhO
14 replies 81 retweets 232 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
I call out CNN when they lie. I call out Alex Jones when he lies. I’m interested. When you went on his show you should’ve called out Alex Jones for his lies — 9/11 Trutherism, Sandy Hook hoax lies, PizzaGate, & much more — but you didn’t. Will you call him out right here & now?
15 replies 1 retweet 26 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Sure, I call out the Democrats for their support for Louis Farrakhan all the time. It’s atrocious. Wrong is wrong. Evil is evil. And lies are lies — whether they come from Louis Farrakhan or Alex Jones or anyone else.
3 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @JerryDunleavy
And CNN? Are they good or not? Remember Russian collusion, the Doctor Jackson hoax, the Charlottesville hoax, Stormy Daniels revenge porn programming, and the guy with a bad arm hoax. To name a few.
4 replies 6 retweets 44 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
To repeat: I call out CNN when they lie. I call out Alex Jones when he lies. And when you went on his show you should’ve called out Alex Jones for his lies — 9/11 Trutherism, Sandy Hook hoax lies, PizzaGate, & much more — but you didn’t. Will you call him out right here & now?
10 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @JerryDunleavy
I called out PizzaGate on day one as untrue, but noted it was highly persuasive for its mountain of confirmation bias. Many believed it. I never heard Alex's side of the Sandy Hook story.
7 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
"Because of" is a weasel approach to lying.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ChristianIAm07 @JerryDunleavy
Did you see anyone indicted for collusion?
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes - Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.