I’m guessing if there wasn’t a case there the city wouldn’t have settled the racial discrimination suit.
-
-
Replying to @BonzalezTodd @ScottAdamsSays and
Trump isn’t even talking about the Central Park jogger in that interview. He’s talking about the black woman raped on the same day. That’s the case the Guardian article that Wikipedia uses as a source says nobody cares about because if racism, yet Trump did care.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QA_NJ @BonzalezTodd and
As for the settlement, police recommended not settling and they believe they could win the case. The settlement happened when New York City got a new very liberal mayor who wanted to make his base happy. Stop assuming. Research context.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QA_NJ @ScottAdamsSays and
And...? I’ve researched this case for years and have watched multiple documentaries on it. Your worldview hinges on trump not being racist. You can frame these events in whatever way satisfies you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BonzalezTodd @ScottAdamsSays and
Ah, so you watched documentaries that pushed a particular agenda on you. Your projection about your own need to protect your world view that Trump is racist is amusing. I lived in the area where it happened and you are missing a lot of context.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QA_NJ @ScottAdamsSays and
Glad your assumption is “anything that implies racial discrimination must be biased”. It fits the worldview. Racial discrimination simply doesn’t exist in your world. I think we’re done here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BonzalezTodd @ScottAdamsSays and
Yes, you are running away like a coward because the cognitive dissonance that you are wrong is too painful. I never said racism doesn’t exist. You know nothing about me. All you have are assumptions and more assumptions.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QA_NJ @ScottAdamsSays and
Lmao ok dude. “Not saying racism doesn’t exist, but I will vigorously argue it doesn’t apply in anything involving Trump”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BonzalezTodd @ScottAdamsSays and
Again, absurd absolute. I look at the evidence for individual claims, not vague patterns that let me fantasize things I want to believe.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QA_NJ @ScottAdamsSays and
For example, nearly everyone on the left predicted that Trump would stay silent about the Waffle House killer and the black man who saved lives. I wonder how we keep getting it right ?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You saw the president ignoring a black man who saved lives. I saw a president ignoring an UNARMED human being whose bravery doesn't help the president's pro-gun stance. Which one of us is a racist in this case?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @BonzalezTodd and
Why I love researching the facts myself. I found part of a 1989 Trump interview with Larry King from CNN about his get tough on crime ad. The rape victim he’s talking about isn’t the Central Park jogger but a black woman raped and thrown off of a building in Brooklyn.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.