That's because you didn't read it. It details how Dutch intelligence tracked Russian activities in real time.
-
-
-
Go on and explain why.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It would be a headline story in USA. Therefore, even anti-Trump U.S. media judged it not credible by even their own fake news standards.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
It was. I simply gave you the original source so you couldn't use confirmation bias to ignore it. Unsurprisingly you did it anyway. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/01/26/dutch-media-reveal-country-to-be-secret-u-s-ally-in-war-against-russian-hackers/?utm_term=.7af5ff369806 …
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @NateWatkins @ScottAdamsSays and2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
-
Replying to @NateWatkins @ScottAdamsSays and2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
-
Replying to @NateWatkins @ScottAdamsSays and
To say this didn't make headlines in the US shows you're not paying attention to the subject, which is why you fell for Assange's Seth Rich conspiracy theory.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm just coming up to speed on the topic. Does it feel credible to you that we know so much about another intel agency's top secret work on this one topic?
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Not when you realize how well developed our alliances are in the world of intelligence. It's the same reason Steele went to our IC to provide concerning information about the Trump campaign. You're simply not appreciating how big of a deal Russian interference is.
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Our intel services are not credible either. Unfortunately.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.