Fact check this: If a new law says police can temporarily seize a citizen's weapon when a clear and immediate danger is identified, that BECOMES due process. It is not ignoring due process. @POTUS
-
-
Interpretation of 'clear and immediate danger' is key. Brandishing a weapon means you're a danger. But what if someone has a hate symbol on their home? Do their guns get taken because they 'might' be danger? Who decides? What if that person resists giving up their rights? Not USA
-
Our existing justice system is a series of judgement calls already, from cops to prosecutors to judges to juries. Works okay, with some rough edges.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.