I like Scott Adams, but his thinking here presupposes the existence of a law that doesn't exist, and I didn't hear Trump propose such a law before emoting that due process should come second.https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/969228642986344448 …
-
-
"his obvious meaning" is what I'm having issue with, in light of his actual words. Had the statement not been so explicit, that would be a easier explanation for me to accept.
-
That said, I do make an allowance for taking things too literally - a frequent complaint of my husband.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.