The catch with climate science arguments is that both sides SOUND 100% convincing to non-scientists when viewed in isolation. And we only see the arguments in isolation because the climate alarmists don't want to elevate the dissenters to equal-looking status. See the problem?https://twitter.com/TexCIS/status/960960633746333696 …
-
-
If they are right, why are they so belligerently defensive about it? The intellectually honest philosophy of science game is to engage with skepticism. Could it be that AGW is essentially political rather than scientific?
-
The book "Green Tyranny" traces the history of environmentalism way back; in my experience, one goal of environmentalism has always been about political control to effect environmental "protection."
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.