The catch with climate science arguments is that both sides SOUND 100% convincing to non-scientists when viewed in isolation. And we only see the arguments in isolation because the climate alarmists don't want to elevate the dissenters to equal-looking status. See the problem?https://twitter.com/TexCIS/status/960960633746333696 …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
Isn't the standard betting move for the lay person to just throw in with the scientists ? If we're talking personal probabilities, why wouldn't that make the most sense ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @cshurshtopf
Yes, unless there are clear and classic tells for mass delusion and you are experienced at recognizing them.
4 replies
1 retweet
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.