Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
ScottAdamsSays's profile
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Scott Adams
Verified account
@ScottAdamsSays

Tweets

Scott AdamsVerified account

@ScottAdamsSays

My Micro Lesson (2-4 min. videos) on being more happier and more effective in life are on Locals: http://bit.ly/2Ygv2tf 

Pleasanton CA
youtube.com/c/realCoffeeWi…
Joined October 2014

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Dennis Just  🌵‏ @sciencepolicia 23 Jan 2018
      Replying to @sciencepolicia @ScottAdamsSays @seriouslysushi

      If anything, switching to proxies vs the instrumental record (which I originally thought was the object of your musings) spreads out the network of "gatekeepers" dramatically - every expedition to get an ice core, every tree ring group, every coral study, etc.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    2. Dennis Just  🌵‏ @sciencepolicia 24 Jan 2018
      Replying to @sciencepolicia @ScottAdamsSays @seriouslysushi

      Does that make sense, Scott? I worry your followers only saw your tweet, and so missed the fact that Mann and a handful of others aren't the sole gatekeepers of data (reconstructions, really) on whether current temps are the highest in at least the past millennium.

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 24 Jan 2018
      Replying to @sciencepolicia @seriouslysushi

      How much human “correction” to the data is there?

      5 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
    4. Dennis Just  🌵‏ @sciencepolicia 24 Jan 2018
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @seriouslysushi

      But that's a different question, right? I mean, I'd like to discuss that, too. But please don't abandon the gatekeeper/trust thread entirely. When you do science, there's a TON of corrections ;) Calibration, bias subtraction, it's the bulk of a paper's data section.

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    5. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 25 Jan 2018
      Replying to @sciencepolicia @seriouslysushi

      What percent of the 97% of scientists backing climate change personally collected measurements from each of the sources/methods worldwide? (This discussion is not optimized for Twitter.)

      2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
    6. Dennis Just  🌵‏ @sciencepolicia 25 Jan 2018
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @seriouslysushi

      A tiny fraction - not a lot. But there's enough (~100s), spread across the globe, independent institutions, etc, that it's not "faith" or "trust" that these ~100s of independent folks aren't being careful with their measurements. (W.r.t. Twitter, agreed!)

      3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    7. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 25 Jan 2018
      Replying to @sciencepolicia @seriouslysushi

      All of those hundreds have personally gathered worldwide temperature data from each source? (Literally traveling to each?)

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    8. Dennis Just  🌵‏ @sciencepolicia 25 Jan 2018
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @seriouslysushi

      ??? No one person collects every proxy. Different teams go to different sources. So we have ~100s of people who can vouch for ~100s of proxies, but not one person who can vouch for them all. Does that make sense?

      3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    9. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 25 Jan 2018
      Replying to @sciencepolicia @seriouslysushi

      Got it. And how many of those measuring sites have more than one device in place (of a different type) to double-check the main device?

      3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
    10. Standing Tall Neanderthal‏ @StevenLord58 25 Jan 2018
      Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @sciencepolicia @seriouslysushi

      Some sites are now in heat islands (near Walmart parking lots). Years ago in corn fields.

      4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 25 Jan 2018
      Replying to @StevenLord58 @sciencepolicia @seriouslysushi

      And also don't cover major areas of the planet?

      3:49 PM - 25 Jan 2018
      • 2 Likes
      • Kevin Watson Dennis Just 🌵
      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Dennis Just  🌵‏ @sciencepolicia 25 Jan 2018
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @StevenLord58 @seriouslysushi

          They cover enough :) (And you can statistically account for what you don't in the error budget)pic.twitter.com/8f7kntZ9JL

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Scott Adams‏Verified account @ScottAdamsSays 25 Jan 2018
          Replying to @sciencepolicia @StevenLord58 @seriouslysushi

          I used to do forecasting. You just said "guessing."

          4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. caerbannog666  🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️ 🏴‍☠️‏ @caerbannog666 25 Jan 2018
          Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @StevenLord58 and

          Temp anomalies are correlated over very long distances; as a result, only a very sparse sampling of the Earth's surface is necessary to prove that the planet is warming. Here are results computed from just 30 stations (30-station-raw(green)&adjusted(blue) compared with NASA(red).pic.twitter.com/pzbi1iWsO7

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. caerbannog666  🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🏴‍☠️ 🏴‍☠️‏ @caerbannog666 26 Jan 2018
          Replying to @caerbannog666 @ScottAdamsSays and

          I hope these results have convinced you that the NASA global temperature results are robust. Confirming the warming reported by NASA requires <1% of the temperature stations that NASA uses; the GHCN network of global temperature stations is massively redundant for that purpose.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info