I haven't been following this Peter Strzok/FBI/texts/Russia investigation thing very closely, b/c it seems like little more than a partisan muddle, but isn't this a pretty strong piece of evidence exonerating from charges of being an anti-Trump hack? http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/23/in-jaw-dropping-text-peter-strzok-expressed-concern-about-joining-mueller-team/ …
-
Show this thread
-
The responses to this are reminding me why I prefer to mostly tweet about music and elections these days, not politics.
10 replies 0 retweets 29 likesShow this thread -
beginning to see the public choice theory case for "rational ignorance."
4 replies 1 retweet 23 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @EsotericCD
As someone who thinks most of the back-and-forth on this crap, on both sides, is overwrought, I'm profoundly disturbed that an agency directed by law and by regulation to preserve everything about investigations ... inexplicably didn't.
2 replies 7 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @ThomasHCrown @EsotericCD
This raises giant red flags about either (a) record retention (b) in-house tech work (c) the impartiality of the investigations (d) corruption (e) some combination of the above.
7 replies 4 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @ThomasHCrown
It bothers me too. But I have no idea how much weight to give it.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EsotericCD @ThomasHCrown
For what it's worth,
@ScottAdamsSays is predicting that the "missing" messages will mostly contain the kind of messages you'd expect between two people in an intimate/personal relationship, and not plotting the overthrow of the govt. (did I get that right, Scott?)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Correct.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.