If the rule of international law states no oil to NK, then no oil it should be! Whatever it takes.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Act of war towards the country whose flag the ship flies unless interception sanctioned under maritime conventions.
-
So the US could soon be at war with Liberia, The Bahamas, and Vanuatu?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In the very least it's bad form. Maybe even impolite. If not downright bordering on rude.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think intercepting Russia and Chinese ships will be seen as an act of war...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You thinking about taking a couple of barrels in your sailboat?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You do realise North Korea is not within America jurisdiction and you have no business harassing any non USA ship in international waters.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Naval blockade has been considered a de facto casus belli since time immemorial.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By international law standards: Yes, if interception constitutes a blockade of N. Korea; No, if there's an international agreement providing for interdiction (as there was with the slave trade in the early-mid 19th century).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.