Have you noticed that the people who know President Trump the best, and personally, say he's definitely not a racist, yet strangers are sure he is? The American Psychiatric Association says that even EXPERTS trying to diagnose people they haven't met is quackery.https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/953018760461537281 …
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
the people who benefit economically from Trump defend him. others have a more objective view. if I hear credible evidence that someone picked up a gun and shot someone else, I'd feel comfortable pronouncing that person a murderer. Trump's actions make it easy to discern.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @patobryan
The American Psychiatric Association says "easy to discern" is an illusion and quackery. That's why they don't approve of anyone, including professionals, diagnosing people they don't know as patients.
5 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays
mind games. they don't work in the long run. again, Trump says and does racist things. that makes him a racist. I don't have to be a qualified psychiatrist to "diagnose" that. I just have to know the definition of the word "racism."
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patobryan @ScottAdamsSays
You simply can't imagine a different reason than racism for the things he says. Failure of the imagination does not make you correct nor him a racist.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Munchensenton @ScottAdamsSays
aw, BS. and NLP 101 to you, too. I know a racist comment when I see/hear one. I know the definition of the word "racist."
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patobryan @Munchensenton
Actually, you don’t, according to science. You just think you do. Do you deny the cognitive sciences?
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Munchensenton
hmmm.... why don't you give me a link to a peer-reviewed scientific article that will convince me that I don't know the meaning of a 2-syllable word in the English language?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @patobryan @Munchensenton
Because that’s off topic. The question is whether you can read minds. You say yes, I say science disagrees.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Munchensenton
never claimed I could read minds, nor am I concerned with Trump's most secret inner-most thoughts. I identify his racist words and actions as racist. I identify the sky as blue this afternoon.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Why do you let the NYT’s off the hook? Or the NFL? They have clear racial outcomes independent of their intentions.pic.twitter.com/R1o40enko4
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Munchensenton
my goodness. Bokonon would say, "busy, busy, busy." My point is that Trump says and does racist things. I'm unconcerned and unaffected by the NFL.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patobryan @Munchensenton
What would be an example of an immigration rule change that would NOT be racist in outcome? Think carefully.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.