Also, we should avoid demanding that there be a SINGLE cause.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Repeat for every chart, graph, explanation of research, and so on, presented to non-scientists, to try to persuade them about some science-related claim. But yes, the claim that "real scientists" aren't skeptical of CAGW is fallacious.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
More important criticism: Final data point is in the year 1855. It should not be a surprise that modern global warming is not depicted here. 21st century mean temperatures in that part of Greenland are about -27C (off the charts according to this graph).
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
I’m not sure it’s time yet to go long that chart
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They use Deuterium (heavy water) as a proxy for temperature and CO2 in bubbles locked in the ice. Volcanic dust from known past mega eruptions provides time scale. Seems reasonable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You don’t automatically believe every graph relating to some supposedly collected set of data that someone posts on Twitter? Did someone fail you in a trust exercise previously?pic.twitter.com/HYEOJYCa2z
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.