Trumpers who reject all of the evidence staring them in the face about collusion and subsequent obstruction remind me of a joke Soviets used to tell about Brezhnev's legendary ability to be in denial about the mess in the old USSR. /1
-
-
The backwards reasoning here is that major evidence exists-- pointing to Trump firing Comey as a means to stop the 'Russian investigation.' Still wouldlegal (what
@AlanDersh points to). Regardless, there is almost zero evidence that it's true anyway...https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/942818805725540353 … -
It has to be some other illegal act tied in with firing Comey. Almost non of the opposing legal experts will address this point directly -- because no evidence for that exists (outside of some vague - not provable - malevolent intent in Trump's action)...https://twitter.com/BEN123L/status/942823326325592064 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm glad that he qualified his statement. In the interview I saw, he gave no such qualification.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.