Have you seen reporting to the contrary?
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @future_dynamics and
Is this serious? Do you know why adoptions would be discussed? Have you heard the name Magnitsky? Bill Browder? Holy crap. You're not this naive?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @future_dynamics and
Ok. So adoptions equals retaliation for sanctions. So discussing adoptions is discussing sanctions. Talking about a quid pro quo on sanctions. Do you not see how that's really bad for Trump?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @shaunlysen @future_dynamics and
You’re reporting the news. I saw the news. When a lawyer says any of that is a crime I will pay attention.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @future_dynamics and
Do you not know what Veselnitskaya was offering? Why did Trump Jr change his story 4 times?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @shaunlysen @future_dynamics and
We all saw the same news. You’re fighting with some sort of hallucination of my opinion not my actual opinion.
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @shaunlysen and
Sounds like Adams is saying, absent reporting that a crime was committed, he doesn’t care if there was collusion, he doesn’t think ethics are important, and that he’s content to ignore the reality that more criminal indictments against Trump et al are likely forthcoming.
3 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @davidaricjones @shaunlysen and
Your hallucinations are noted.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @shaunlysen and
Do you always take the time to respond to people you deem quacks, or is today just my lucky day? It’d be fascinating to know where my interpretation went off the rails, but your unnecessary (and yet equivocal) response is nevertheless noted in turn.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I often call out people who exhibit obvious signs of cognitive dissonance because it's what I write about. You made the cut by imagining you can discern my inner thoughts.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @shaunlysen and
You misinterpret my tweet. I don’t actually think I have psychic abilities, Mr. Adams. That’s just silly. I was deducing your positions from your previous tweets in the thread and stating them explicitly as a sardonic critique.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @davidaricjones @ScottAdamsSays and
you are deducing very poorly, ergo it looks like psychic abilities. And you don't really want to understand, you simply repeat yourself.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.