by the Murdoch controlled WSJ editorial board.. To say "no evidence" is also rich, considering they do not have visibility into Mueller's non-public work.
-
-
-
Not by the "Murdoch controlled WSJ editorial board," by the fact that there's literally no evidence of collusion after this has been investigated for 13 months. It's a politically motivated farce and it's falling apart on them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
He’s chasing the Russian money laundering your
s have been moving. Manafort already has been proven to be a part of it, looking more and more like Trumps name is all over it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The conclusions drawn in this editorial are no logical. The Special Counsel reports t the DOJ who decides what goes to Congress. 2nd any team member found talking about the case w/ any outside party is removed full stop. Removal is not based on what was said
-
DOJ decides what goes to the Grand Jury? The Special Counsel does not present it? Hmmm....
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Aluminum tubes and yellow cake?
End of conversation
-
-
-
If Hugh Hewitt wrote a column on it you know it must be bad. It takes a lot to get Hewitt riled up. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-special-counsel-needs-to-investigate-the-fbi-and-justice-department-now/2017/12/04/5ca1234c-d916-11e7-b1a8-62589434a581_story.html?utm_term=.3112b79f9df6 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.