TFW the Dilbert guy (@ScottAdamsSays) is a far more sensible commentator on US politics than 95% of professional pundits. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/558312/win-bigly-by-scott-adams/9780735219717/ …
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @Dr_Tad @ScottAdamsSays
But also quite wrong about substantive points (eg climate change)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Dr_Tad @ScottAdamsSays
In fairness the book may be different, but i think here he quite substantively misrepresents the reality of climate science http://blog.dilbert.com/2017/09/11/when-to-trust-the-experts-climate-and-otherwise/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Dr_Tad @ScottAdamsSays
For example asking if temps are peer reviewed (he says not). In fact many datasets peer reviewed and publicly available
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @themorningswan @Dr_Tad
False characterization. What else do you have?
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @Dr_Tad
I broadly agree with you, but counter productive to editorialise on this after stating youre not qualified to do so?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @themorningswan @ScottAdamsSays
I thought Adams said that *some* well-known data sets were shut off from peer review. Was unsure about others.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
One in particular.
-
-
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.