@ScottAdamsSays Getting sick of ur apologist reflex, esp when uninformed/ignorant. You excuse Comey for using non legal term "extreme negligence" rather than criminal statute "gross negligence". But YES is indeed the job of FBI to CHARGE a crime. Comey corruptly shied from that.
-
-
You're such an apologist about Clinton's private email server. Haha
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Reason u've been called an apologist for both sides is that you have indeed been an apologist for both sides. Comes naturally, almost a reflex for you. But "Apologist" is assuredly NOT someone w diff opinion. That's being an apologist for being an apologist. (But I'm still a fan)
-
Still a fan due to your very intelligent, creative perspectives on a lot of things. But the apologist thing really is a negative and detracts from your persuasive power. Listening to you is like listening to a smarter older brother or to a very bright college roommate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's pure bunk. Look it up. To say that "Apologist" is just a different political opinion is to subvert and be an apologist for being an apologist. Dishonest. Apologists are fundamentally dishonest. That's the problem.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.