You mean alleged ties, according to a source that isn't credible. If true, worth looking at. I wouldn't defend any real racism.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @BillKristol
Are you arguing that the Forward isn't credible? Are you arguing that every news outlet covering Gorka and Trump isn't credible?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dropoutnation @BillKristol
Yes, I'm arguing that 100% of the media covering Trump-related issues are not credible. I thought that was common knowledge by now.
4 replies 4 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @BillKristol
There is no such thing as "common knowledge". Also, your argument runs counter to every single bit of evidence.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Of course, you haven't made your case. You have only engaged in the barroom version of college bull session-talking. Try making it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dropoutnation @BillKristol
I demolished the facts supporting your worldview and triggered cognitive dissonance. You're now hallucinating that I was not honest.
6 replies 2 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @BillKristol
You demolished nothing. You couldn't even offer a link to data and evidence. As I have done. Example: http://forward.com/news/national/366181/exclusive-nazi-allied-group-claims-top-trump-aide-sebastian-gorka-as-sworn/?attribution=author-article-listing-2-headline …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
-
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
And http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/full-transcript-of-trumps-both-sides-charlottesville-presser …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
He clearly disavowed bigots. What part is objectionable?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.