Then at least endeavor to explain.
-
-
Replying to @robhon_ @ScottAdamsSays and
Exactly,if you say you've been misinterpreted don't turn it into a guessing game. Clarify what you meant and explain what was misinterpreted
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @CollinMaessen and
Scott, I have to laugh here! You’ve yet to make one actual substantive response to any of my comments.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @CollinMaessen and
That's because your comments don't address anything but your hallucinations of my opinions.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @CollinMaessen and
Again! This is not a substantive response. It’s pure hand-waving.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @CollinMaessen and
What would be a good example of a substantive response to another person's hallucination?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @robhon_ and
Because the goal posts seem to be shifting at your will, give us a stated opinion we can work from.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @the_deep_donald @robhon_ and
Okay: Climate scientists persuade poorly.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @robhon_ and
Yet the vast majority of the world’s population believe the climate scientists. Maybe you’re not paying attention, then generalizing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The first half of the population you can get with "trust us." The second half is the hard part.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @robhon_ and
90% awareness, 70% major concern, 60% man made. That’s the global break down of messaging effectiveness. Solid numbers.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.