There are 14 in the essay alone.
-
-
Replying to @PeterGleick @robhon_ and
Or are there 14 misinterpretations of my views, which is the normal situation for me. Name just one of my errors in a simple statement.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @PeterGleick and
You said the same thing yesterday and disappeared when it was addressed.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @PeterGleick and
You provided one example and I told you it didn't represent my opinion (as I knew). Why would I read the rest? Waste of time.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @PeterGleick and
Then at least endeavor to explain.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @ScottAdamsSays and
Exactly,if you say you've been misinterpreted don't turn it into a guessing game. Clarify what you meant and explain what was misinterpreted
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @CollinMaessen and
Scott, I have to laugh here! You’ve yet to make one actual substantive response to any of my comments.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @CollinMaessen and
That's because your comments don't address anything but your hallucinations of my opinions.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @CollinMaessen and
Again! This is not a substantive response. It’s pure hand-waving.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
What would be a good example of a substantive response to another person's hallucination?
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @robhon_ and
Because the goal posts seem to be shifting at your will, give us a stated opinion we can work from.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @the_deep_donald @robhon_ and
Okay: Climate scientists persuade poorly.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.