Scott is an expert in neither apple nor cart. And that’s the essence of the issue here!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @robhon_ @ArsVampyre and
If you can't offer even one statement where we disagree, I'm going to block you so I don't have to see your nonsense anymore. Just one.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ArsVampyre and
I did this yesterday but here it is again. You don’t grasp the purpose of climate models.pic.twitter.com/4ZmJmj3itu
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @ArsVampyre and
Everyone grasps the purpose of climate models. Everyone smart knows they speak to probability and a range. Your point is nonsense.
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ArsVampyre and
In claiming scientists should just present one model, that’s not the case. You fail to understand models AND basic scientific process.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @ArsVampyre and
This is a misrepresentation of my point: "In claiming scientists should just present one model..." I didn't claim that.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ArsVampyre and
Yes you did, Scott. It’s right there in your own blog.pic.twitter.com/Fq6voCZfwh
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @ArsVampyre and
The context is persuasion. You're on a different topic. See it yet?
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ArsVampyre and
Scott, are you suggesting scientist must abandon scientific facts in order to persuade?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ArsVampyre and
In your blog you stated they should use one model. Are you changing your position? It’s fine if you are.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.