I can (and did) defend my interpretations of your statements. You have not.
-
-
Replying to @robhon_ @ScottAdamsSays and
I declare Rob the winner. Scott has refused to acknowledge overwhelming evidence of GW, but clings to his small-sample kneeling conclusion.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ArsVampyre @the_deep_donald and
Debating the presentation of science wld require that one have a nominal grasp of the subject matter. Scott doesn’t: https://www.skepticalscience.com/a-perfect-twitter-storm.html …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ArsVampyre @the_deep_donald and
The problem is, in this Scott is making completely erroneous statements about the science AND about the presentation of the science.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @ArsVampyre and
Name one erroneous statement I have made about science in this context.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
-
Replying to @PeterGleick @robhon_ and
Or are there 14 misinterpretations of my views, which is the normal situation for me. Name just one of my errors in a simple statement.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @PeterGleick and
You said the same thing yesterday and disappeared when it was addressed.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
You provided one example and I told you it didn't represent my opinion (as I knew). Why would I read the rest? Waste of time.
-
-
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @PeterGleick and
Then at least endeavor to explain.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @ScottAdamsSays and
Exactly,if you say you've been misinterpreted don't turn it into a guessing game. Clarify what you meant and explain what was misinterpreted
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.