I can (and did) defend my interpretations of your statements. You have not.
-
-
Replying to @robhon_ @ScottAdamsSays and
I declare Rob the winner. Scott has refused to acknowledge overwhelming evidence of GW, but clings to his small-sample kneeling conclusion.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ArsVampyre @the_deep_donald and
Debating the presentation of science wld require that one have a nominal grasp of the subject matter. Scott doesn’t: https://www.skepticalscience.com/a-perfect-twitter-storm.html …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ArsVampyre @the_deep_donald and
The problem is, in this Scott is making completely erroneous statements about the science AND about the presentation of the science.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @ArsVampyre and
Name one erroneous statement I have made about science in this context.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @ArsVampyre and
Dude! For the umpteenth time... read my piece! https://www.skepticalscience.com/a-perfect-twitter-storm.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robhon_ @ArsVampyre and
I already debunked your first claim misinterpreted claim. No need to read the rest.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @ScottAdamsSays @robhon_ and
1 out of 14, and Scott declares total victory in his own mind. (golf clap)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I'm simply demonstrating that the article isn't about my opinion if he can't state even one that is accurate.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.